by Gerard Valentino
Quite often when a pro-gun advocate brings up the gun issue, politically-astute friends roll their eyes and try to shut down debate. It could be because many gun owners are single-minded, or because some of the right, including many Republicans, realize they missed the boat on the issue.
We can’t forget, however, that the gun movement was the precursor to the Tea Party and to the anti-big government backlash in America today.
Now, word has leaked out that President Obama is going to address the nation on gun control and he is sure to try and divide the political right over the issue by claiming that reasonable gun control is the key to unity on the issue. The problem is that President Obama’s definition of “reasonable” is a total ban on the private ownership of firearms, such as has existed in his hometown of Chicago. Another problem is far too many Republicans are unwilling to admit that the gun issue is key to their electoral success.
President Obama’s message is sure to include a statement that all Americans can unite behind the quest to keep criminals, the mentally ill and others from easily obtaining a gun. To be honest, such a message seems reasonable and seems like a policy that makes perfect sense. The problem is that, in practice, the gun control advocates have always used reasonable gun control as a way to destroy the rights of law abiding citizens.
