by Chad D. Baus WDTN (NBC Dayton) reported recently that a man had been fatally stabbed by his girlfriend, who was at the home of her bed ridden parents when he kicked…
Anti-gun attorney’s Dispatch op-ed filleted in response by John Lott
by Chad D. Baus
On Friday, July 29, The Columbus Dispatch published a guest op-ed by Columbus attorney Jack D’Aurora, entitled “Concealed-carry laws do not reduce crime.”
In the op-ed, D’Aurora parrots an article by Ian Ayres and John J. Donohue, published in the Stanford Law Review back in 2003, claiming that laws that permit concealed-carry licenses correlate to higher crime rates. At the time, Ayres and Donohue were responding to a 1998 book by economist John Lott, entitled “More Guns, Less Crime.”
It is apparent that D’Aurora either was unprofessionally ignorant or intentionally ignored the work of other academics that don’t fit in with Ayres and Donohue’s world view. Nor is D’Aurora capable of considering that Ayres and Donohue would so distort what Lott’s work was.
Even more bizarre is the fact that D’Aurora writes his op-ed as though Ayres and Donohue had published their piece yesterday, rather than more than eight years ago, and before the release of TWO new editions of “More Guns, Less Crime.” D’Aurora also offers the types of “blood in the streets” -style warnings about concealed carry that Ohioans were accustomed to hearing in 2003, during the debate that led up to passage of our concealed carry law, but have since been recognized by the general public as having been extremely Chicken Little-esque.
While the Dispatch allowed D’Aurora 756 words in a heralded guest op-ed to attack Lott, they saw fit to allow Lott just 400 words on the Letters to the Editor section with which to respond. Despite those limits, Lott has succeeded in absolutely filleting D’Aurora via his response, which was published on Saturday, August 6.
Toledo gun owner helps police track down robbery suspect
by Chad D. Baus
WUPW, Toledo’s Fox News affiliate, is reporting that a Toledo gun owner helped Toledo police catch a robbery suspect in broad daylight late last week.
From the article:
Toledo Police and Monroe County deputies scoured neighborhoods north of Alexis Road for 2 hours Thursday morning. Police say the suspect was originally from the area and knew the terrain well allowing him to duck in and out of backyards along both sides of the state line.
The three men who caught up with the suspect say he ditched a backpack full of cash and a gun behind a shed shortly before they encountered him in a quiet neighborhood near Secor Road.
The men say the suspect grabbed a shovel and one neighbor countered with a rake while a second pulled a gun.
Op-ed: Responsibly protecting our right to bear arms
Editor’s Note: The following guest op-ed was originally published in The Ironton Tribune.
by Terry Johnson
As United States citizens, we are all endowed with certain inalienable rights, protected from government restrictions and limitations.
In 1791, the Bill of Rights was adopted by our young nation, cementing our basic personal liberties.
Among the most fundamental of these freedoms is the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, affirming our right to bear arms. The founding fathers recognized our need to be able to defend ourselves against those who wish to do us harm.
The Second Amendment gives the people the power to own and use guns for lawful purposes, and millions of firearm owners across America responsibly exercise this right every day.
As your state representative, I believe it’s important to uphold and follow the language of the Second Amendment. Our own state constitution reaffirms the right to bear arms, included in the original draft in 1802.
To abide by these foundational documents and ensure the full freedoms of my constituents, I have been involved in various pro-gun rights legislation this General Assembly.
I saw that there were several points where our state law did not conform to our constitutionally granted liberties, both on a state and a national level. To this end, I have sponsored and supported two related bills to revise present firearm codes.
Along with my colleague, Rep. Danny Bubp, I jointly sponsored House Bill 45.
The legislation will allow citizens who have valid concealed handgun licenses to carry their firearms into restaurants serving alcohol.
Cop out: Is behavior of Canton police officer a good reason not to get a concealed handgun license?
by Gerard Valentino
Recently, I got an email from a “friend” that said the video of the Canton cop berating a concealed handgun license holder is yet another reason why he doesn’t get a CHL. It was another in a long line of reasons my friend used to rationalize his decision to not get a license to carry.
First, he didn’t want the government to know he had a gun, and the license put him on a list. Then, the car carry rules were too hard to follow. As the car carry rules were slowly reformed, he claimed the obligation to notify a law enforcement officer if he was carrying violated his rights.
All of his reasons sound reasonable and I agree in principle.
Except by waiting to get his license, my friend let other gun owners put their neck on the line and is willing to accept the benefits.
Let me start by saying my friend has every right not to get his license – after all, this is America. The problem I have is his compulsion to justify his decision.
Below is the email I sent to my friend in response to his latest excuse. It is unedited, and these are my personal feelings, they are not an official position of Buckeye Firearms Association.
To my friend:
MOVIE REVIEW: Living for 32 or Living off 32? Docuganda and the Institutionalization of Victimhood
by Brian Anse Patrick The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence (formerly Handgun Control, Inc.) has for several months been touring a new documentary film around the country. Living for 32 stars…
FBI Implicated in Gun-Smuggling Operation
by Alan Korwin
An insider source investigating BATFE’s gun smuggling to vicious Mexican drug cartels, reveals that several of the so-called “straw purchasers” were prohibited possessors, or had suspended drivers’ licenses and other problems that should have prevented them from passing the NICS background check.
Three of the straw purchasers, now indicted, had criminal histories, including a pending class 3 felony charge for burglary, an order of protection, a domestic-violence conviction, and a felony for resisting arrest, later reduced (and criminal damage charge dropped). Any of these should have prevented, or at least delayed purchases when they hit the FBI NICS computer. One defendant even had a CCW permit, under circumstances that seem suspicious but remain unclear.
Whistleblower BATFE agent John Dodson apparently indicated that the NICS system had these buyers flagged for special treatment, and that when a sale request came through, it was routed to a special FBI office that approved the purchases, according to William La Jeunesse at FOX News. Dodson’s prior statements are absolutely incriminating, and riveting: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/03/eveningnews/main20039031.shtml
This implies that the FBI may have been complicit in the scheme, allowing BATFE’s mules to get possession of guns when they should have been blocked. How people with disqualifying criminal records or a suspended driver’s license could have repeatedly gotten through the tightly run NICS system is difficult to otherwise explain.
Bombshell: Testimony reveals White House knew about ATF gunrunning scandal
CBS News is reporting that a key ATF manager told Congress on July 26 he discussed the ATF’s controversial gunwalking operation with a White House National Security staffer as early as September…
Winner announced for Kahr pistol gun giveaway!
Congratulations to Ralph Fuquay of Odessa, Texas, who is the winner in our most recent gun giveaway. Ralph was pretty happy to receive his brand new Kahr CW45, a semi-automatic handgun built…
Felony or Felony Stupid: ATF shouldn’t be Rewarded
by Jeff Knox
Representative Darrel Issa (R-CA) referred to the activities of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) Operation Fast and Furious as “felony stupid.” Others have suggested that the plan was intentionally designed and cleverly crafted to bolster statistics in support of stricter gun control laws. Whether the operation was just stupid or intentionally criminal, it was clearly bad behavior on the part of ATF and Justice Department (DOJ) and such bad behavior should not be rewarded.
Some members of Congress, Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and Elijah Cummings (D-MD) in particular, want to reward ATF and DOJ’s criminal stupidity with increased funding and increased authority through tighter regulation of firearms dealers and lawful firearm purchasers. ATF has introduced – and the Administration has now approved – and “emergency” regulatory change requiring firearms dealers in border states to report any purchaser who buys more than one semi-auto rifle greater than a .22 within a given week. The US House of Representatives promptly, and properly, rejected the new regulations by passing an appropriations rider prohibiting any funds from being used to enact or enforce the plan.
Proponents of the regulation argue that it gives ATF an important tool to help detect straw buyers and traffickers and that it poses little inconvenience to lawful gun buyers. Many on our side disagree, but usefulness and inconvenience aside, the fact is that Congress has looked at long gun reporting in the past and rejected the idea. For ATF and the Obama administration to now push forward, bypassing Congress, in order to do something Congress has previously refused to do is clearly overreaching and probably illegal. If Congress had passed a law setting auto mileage standards, but had specifically chosen to omit larger pickups from those standards, it would be outrageous for some bureaucracy to later enact regulations including trucks. This case is no different except that it is questionable whether even Congress has the authority to regulate firearms sales. Unelected bureaucrats certainly don’t.
